Join our newly restarted iOS Beta and try out new features sooner: https://testflight.apple.com/join/PDzBYbJw
Read more about ABRP beta at Installing the ABRP Beta version
p7plus is wrongly shown as not compatible with type 2 with cable. Type 2 with no cable no problem.
SoC in the app and on the car not identical I've only had the app for a short time. I don't know if it's the car, because my model has only existed since 2026 and I could only select a model from 2025 in the APP. Type: Astra Sports Tourer Key No. 2525 ABV00025 Battery Gross 58kw / Net 55 I observe that the SoC value in the APP is always slightly higher than the value that is shown to me in the car display. At the last charging stop, a value of 8% was displayed in the APP, 5% in the car. How can I correct this? Side question: How can I have the mileage read out via the OBD. This is possible on the basis of other amounts, with other cars?
The button to create a route which ends at the beginning with one click is no longer available. There ist just the button to turn the route upside down.
Hello, Since the beginning of this week, most superchargers in Germany are not listed under Tesla chargers in ABRP, leading to wrong routes when you have Tesla as a favorite provider. A few examples: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=540887078 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=1954969416 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=476834495 None of them are selected when trying to plan a drive from Switzerland to Hamburg, with Tesla as the sole preferred option.
First off, the new search menu is awesome! The only issue I'm having is that it isn't minimized as the default like it was before the update which causes it to take up the entire navigation window in windowed android auto.
Please don’t use Motorway Links as a shortcut. This is embarrassing (usually just merging with the same traffic again) and antisocial. It also makes me doubt every redirection ABRP is suggesting to me. These links are correctly tagged in OSM, so I expect that this problem can be avoided. I realize there are closed/completed issues without fix for this, but it is really starting to become a reason to drop using ABRP. Plan link: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=2-6ae31f31-32ca461e646592473b145846
I’ve noticed that ABRP is giving unnecessary instructions on long highway drives when there are rest stops along the highway. For example when you navigate over the German A1 from Osnabrueck to Bremen it will tell you three times to “continue” at rest stop exits. I did some comparison with other routing systems and it appears these instructions are created by Valhalla.
While on a road trip I wanted to see only fast chargers, so I disabled Type 2 on my car: But then ABRP still lists some chargers: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=1770751841 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=348387499 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=1724056298 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=354445277 Happens both on 7.5.0 (6062) (Android + AA) and Version 7.1.12 (6058) (browser).
Hi, Please advise what kind of settings should be carried so ABRP could work properly in my car. At the moment my car is unlocked and I have assigned BYDmate to give information to ABRP but there are 2 problems detected ABRP can't obtain the information of battery capacity from BYDmate ABRP isn't updating frequently my position from the GPS. There is huge delay between the real position of the car and the GPS position at ABRP application. Please be advised that i have installed and other navigation systems such as google maps, waze, offline maps and all of them are working properly taking a live data from the GPS ABRP is updated to the latest version! Please advise if there is any settings that needs to done or if I should install some other version of ABRP where the application is working properly in BYD
Hello. I purchased a 1-year subscription in early October 2026. The program works, but for some reason, after 10:15, the stored history data becomes unusable—it displays all sorts of incorrect data, it displays incorrect charging figures, and sometimes it can’t even record the total length of the route. In fact, yesterday I was coming home from Slovakia, and for some reason it tried to plan a detour to the same address as Google Maps or Waze? I tried it out this summer and was a subscriber for a month, but both then and now—as of October 14—that part of the app worked perfectly; now it’s unusable. On my recent trip to Slovakia, it was also way off in estimating the battery charge percentage (it estimated 48%, but the battery was actually at 56% when I reached my destination). This app is therefore unusable for me. Please help me, or if you cannot help, please refund me the amount equivalent to 11 months of my annual subscription! I look forward to your response.
Problem: With Optimal routing selected, the plan ABRP shows first is often slower than an alternative further down the list. The fastest plan has to be found by scrolling through all the alternatives. Settings: 450 Wh/mi reference consumption, 110% speed, 80 mph max, 0% degradation, CCS1 + NACS, Optimal routing, depart 100%, 20% arrival, fixed weekend departure date. Route: Lynnwood, WA → Tesla Supercharger Salem, OR → Riverside Inn, Grants Pass, OR (overnight, full charge) → Fresno, CA area. Steps to reproduce: Plan the route above with Cadillac Escalade IQ. Note the total time of the default plan. Swipe or scroll through the alternatives and compare their times. Repeat with Hummer EV Pickup 3X and GMC Sierra EV 2025 Max Range. Actual: Escalade IQ: the default plan is 16h15. A 15h47 plan, 28 min faster, is the 3rd alternative. Hummer EV 3X: the default plan is 16h24. A 15h39 plan, 45 min faster, is the last alternative. Sierra EV Max and Silverado EV Max: the default plan takes a longer route via I-5 / Los Banos. The faster CA-99 route (Chico, Sacramento) appears only among the alternatives. Other profiles, such as the Sierra ER, default to CA-99. Expected: With Optimal selected, the fastest plan is the default, or the alternatives are sorted by total time. Related: Charging-curve bug for the Sierra, Silverado and Escalade IQ Max profiles https://abrp.featurebase.app/p/800v-dc-charging-curve-wrong-for-sierra-ev-max-silverado
Affected profiles: GMC Sierra EV 2025 Max Range, Chevrolet Silverado EV Max Range, Cadillac Escalade IQ. Control (correct): Hummer EV Pickup 3X uses the same 24-module 800V Ultium pack. Extended Range profiles also look correct. Problem: On 350–400 kW 800V chargers, these three profiles plan only ~160–177 kW average. The Hummer 3X gets ~245–255 kW on the same chargers. Manual charging-curve overrides on these profiles are not applied. Settings: 450 Wh/mi reference consumption, 110% speed, 80 mph max, 0% degradation, CCS1 + NACS, Optimal routing, depart 100%, 20% arrival, fixed weekend departure date for every run. Route: Lynnwood, WA → Tesla Supercharger Salem, OR → Riverside Inn, Grants Pass, OR (overnight, full charge) → Fresno, CA area. Steps to reproduce: Plan the route above with GMC Sierra EV 2025 Max Range. Open the IONNA Rechargery Sacramento (Stockton Blvd, 400 kW) stop and note the charge time and average power. Optionally edit the DC curve or that stop’s charge power and re-plan. The change isn’t applied. Repeat with Silverado EV Max Range and Escalade IQ. Repeat with Hummer EV Pickup 3X at 450 Wh/mi as the control. Actual: Sierra EV Max: 15h54 total, 1h26 charging. IONNA Sacramento 7→59% in 38 min (~177 kW). Escalade IQ: 15h47, 1h19 charging. IONNA Sacramento 11→57% in 34 min (~160 kW). Silverado EV Max: same behavior. Sierra EV ER (much smaller pack, 3 stops): 15h58, only 4 min slower than the Max. Hummer 3X @ 450 Wh/mi (control): 15h39, 1h12 charging. IONNA Sacramento 4→59% in 27 min (~255 kW). bp pulse Redding 10→71% in 31 min (~245 kW). Salem Supercharger (V3, 400V mode) is the same in both the Sierra Max and Hummer runs (45 min). Only the 800V curve is wrong. Expected: ~215+ kW average for 10–80% on 800V chargers, matching the Hummer 3X. Sacramento 7→59% in ~27–30 min. Sierra Max total around 15h35–15h40, clearly faster than the ER. Manual overrides should be applied. Plan links: Sierra EV Max (bugged): Link Hummer EV 3X @ 450 Wh/mi (control): Link
Routing has me exiting and re-entering highways for no reason. This has happened on multiple trips in different regions.
My car is an Opel Frontera 54 kW, and the live SOC values are being transmitted to the ABRP program via OBD. I’m heading from Eskişehir to Edirne. It shows that I need to charge at 8 locations. I arrive at the first charging station with a 67% charge and at the second with a 30% charge. Why can’t this app calculate correctly, and why does it sometimes take me off my route to some ridiculousplace? And why doesn’t it adjust its route and suggested charging stations based on the car’s charge level? I purchased a premium subscription, but I’ve found that it never meets my expectations—it’s a huge disappointment.
Hello ABRP Support Team, I would like to report a possible issue with the OBD PID configuration for my 2025 Citroën ë-C3 Max, 44 kWh LFP battery. I am using ABRP on Android 16 with an OBDLink CX Bluetooth adapter, updated to the latest firmware. What works correctly: Direct OBD connection to ABRP is stable. Battery SoC matches the vehicle dashboard. Battery voltage and odometer readings appear correct. Live OBD data updates normally. The issue: ABRP consistently reports a battery temperature of 33°C, regardless of the conditions. Using Car Scanner ELM OBD2 with the same adapter, I obtained the following readings: BMS traction battery temperature: 23°C Average battery temperature: 23°C Individual battery temperature sensors: 23–24°C Battery coolant temperature: 22°C These readings were obtained after a home charging session. ABRP had also reported 33°C on previous occasions, in different conditions. OBD PID configuration observed in ABRP: Battery voltage: 22D510 Telemetry key: voltage Equation: ((A<<8)+B)/10 Battery temperature: 22D4DF Telemetry key: batt_temp Equation: ((A<<8)+B)/100 Interestingly, ABRP reports approximately 333–334 V and 33°C. The battery temperature therefore appears to be approximately one tenth of the voltage. This may be coincidental, but it raises the possibility of an incorrect PID mapping, response decoding, or conversion formula. I have not modified the OBD PID configuration. Could you please verify whether PID 22D4DF and its decoding formula are correct for the Citroën ë-C3? I can provide screenshots of the ABRP PID configuration, live data and Car Scanner temperature readings if helpful. Thank you for your assistance and for improving support for this vehicle.
I have done the first two answers you previously gave me. 1 I have entered a plan request correctly 2 I have several charger types listed and have no driving. Road restrictions. Please advise. I have paid a premium plan and now keep getting. “ cannot calculate a plan “. Please provide tech support
12:46pm EDT I clicked the “bug report” button This route is trying to navigate me into the back entrance of a thruway rest stop to charge at the thruway charger. This is impossible. See https://maps.app.goo.gl/wHXkHkdiimwsCoFD6 for a photo of the closed gate to the dead end employee parking lot.
The map view freezes from time to time, and sometimes the screen goes completely black. The display is quite confusing—mainly because I have to choose between the remaining distance and the travel time between my destination and the next charging station. The app sometimes suggests recalculating the route every 5 minutes. But whatever changes were made remain hidden. Zooming in on the map is so clunky that I’d describe it as nearly impossible.
Real-time traffic updates lag significantly behind the actual situation.