Join our newly restarted iOS Beta and try out new features sooner: https://testflight.apple.com/join/PDzBYbJw
Read more about ABRP beta at Installing the ABRP Beta version
Tell us how we can make ABRP even better for you! ⚡️
In Progress
Tesla Superchargers not listed as Tesla in Germany
Hello, Since the beginning of this week, most superchargers in Germany are not listed under Tesla chargers in ABRP, leading to wrong routes when you have Tesla as a favorite provider. A few examples: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=540887078 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=1954969416 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=476834495 None of them are selected when trying to plan a drive from Switzerland to Hamburg, with Tesla as the sole preferred option.
Awaiting Clarification
Cannot minimize search menu
First off, the new search menu is awesome! The only issue I'm having is that it isn't minimized as the default like it was before the update which causes it to take up the entire navigation window in windowed android auto.
Awaiting Clarification
Don't use Motorway Links as shortcut
Please don’t use Motorway Links as a shortcut. This is embarrassing (usually just merging with the same traffic again) and antisocial. It also makes me doubt every redirection ABRP is suggesting to me. These links are correctly tagged in OSM, so I expect that this problem can be avoided. I realize there are closed/completed issues without fix for this, but it is really starting to become a reason to drop using ABRP. Plan link: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=2-6ae31f31-32ca461e646592473b145846
Awaiting Clarification
Unnecessary maneuver instructions
I’ve noticed that ABRP is giving unnecessary instructions on long highway drives when there are rest stops along the highway. For example when you navigate over the German A1 from Osnabrueck to Bremen it will tell you three times to “continue” at rest stop exits. I did some comparison with other routing systems and it appears these instructions are created by Valhalla.
Individual naming of waypoints / audio waypoints
As ABRP refuses waypoint numbers or letters by concept, it would be very helpful, if waypoints could be named individually. And - before reaching a waypoint, the name / text individually stored should be verbally announced. I use this function in another app (motorcycle navigation) and it is extremely helpful, as it enables users to make audio bookmarks along the route (i.e. a hint, where the small type 2 charger is hidden), or when you pass an excellent café along the route, a historic comment to the region…
Peugeot e-Expert
Hello, can you add the Peugeot e-Expert vehicle? The one with the battery that has a range of about 320 km Thank you
Awaiting Clarification
Type 2 outlet showing even though I disabled it
While on a road trip I wanted to see only fast chargers, so I disabled Type 2 on my car: But then ABRP still lists some chargers: https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=1770751841 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=348387499 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=1724056298 https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?charger_id=354445277 Happens both on 7.5.0 (6062) (Android + AA) and Version 7.1.12 (6058) (browser).
Awaiting Clarification
Wrong data
Hello. I purchased a 1-year subscription in early October 2026. The program works, but for some reason, after 10:15, the stored history data becomes unusable—it displays all sorts of incorrect data, it displays incorrect charging figures, and sometimes it can’t even record the total length of the route. In fact, yesterday I was coming home from Slovakia, and for some reason it tried to plan a detour to the same address as Google Maps or Waze? I tried it out this summer and was a subscriber for a month, but both then and now—as of October 14—that part of the app worked perfectly; now it’s unusable. On my recent trip to Slovakia, it was also way off in estimating the battery charge percentage (it estimated 48%, but the battery was actually at 56% when I reached my destination). This app is therefore unusable for me. Please help me, or if you cannot help, please refund me the amount equivalent to 11 months of my annual subscription! I look forward to your response.
Awaiting Clarification
Optimal routing: default plan is not the fastest alternative
Problem: With Optimal routing selected, the plan ABRP shows first is often slower than an alternative further down the list. The fastest plan has to be found by scrolling through all the alternatives. Settings: 450 Wh/mi reference consumption, 110% speed, 80 mph max, 0% degradation, CCS1 + NACS, Optimal routing, depart 100%, 20% arrival, fixed weekend departure date. Route: Lynnwood, WA → Tesla Supercharger Salem, OR → Riverside Inn, Grants Pass, OR (overnight, full charge) → Fresno, CA area. Steps to reproduce: Plan the route above with Cadillac Escalade IQ. Note the total time of the default plan. Swipe or scroll through the alternatives and compare their times. Repeat with Hummer EV Pickup 3X and GMC Sierra EV 2025 Max Range. Actual: Escalade IQ: the default plan is 16h15. A 15h47 plan, 28 min faster, is the 3rd alternative. Hummer EV 3X: the default plan is 16h24. A 15h39 plan, 45 min faster, is the last alternative. Sierra EV Max and Silverado EV Max: the default plan takes a longer route via I-5 / Los Banos. The faster CA-99 route (Chico, Sacramento) appears only among the alternatives. Other profiles, such as the Sierra ER, default to CA-99. Expected: With Optimal selected, the fastest plan is the default, or the alternatives are sorted by total time. Related: Charging-curve bug for the Sierra, Silverado and Escalade IQ Max profiles https://abrp.featurebase.app/p/800v-dc-charging-curve-wrong-for-sierra-ev-max-silverado
Awaiting Clarification
800V DC charging curve wrong for Sierra EV Max, Silverado EV Max & Escalade IQ (Hummer EV 3X correct)
Affected profiles: GMC Sierra EV 2025 Max Range, Chevrolet Silverado EV Max Range, Cadillac Escalade IQ. Control (correct): Hummer EV Pickup 3X uses the same 24-module 800V Ultium pack. Extended Range profiles also look correct. Problem: On 350–400 kW 800V chargers, these three profiles plan only ~160–177 kW average. The Hummer 3X gets ~245–255 kW on the same chargers. Manual charging-curve overrides on these profiles are not applied. Settings: 450 Wh/mi reference consumption, 110% speed, 80 mph max, 0% degradation, CCS1 + NACS, Optimal routing, depart 100%, 20% arrival, fixed weekend departure date for every run. Route: Lynnwood, WA → Tesla Supercharger Salem, OR → Riverside Inn, Grants Pass, OR (overnight, full charge) → Fresno, CA area. Steps to reproduce: Plan the route above with GMC Sierra EV 2025 Max Range. Open the IONNA Rechargery Sacramento (Stockton Blvd, 400 kW) stop and note the charge time and average power. Optionally edit the DC curve or that stop’s charge power and re-plan. The change isn’t applied. Repeat with Silverado EV Max Range and Escalade IQ. Repeat with Hummer EV Pickup 3X at 450 Wh/mi as the control. Actual: Sierra EV Max: 15h54 total, 1h26 charging. IONNA Sacramento 7→59% in 38 min (~177 kW). Escalade IQ: 15h47, 1h19 charging. IONNA Sacramento 11→57% in 34 min (~160 kW). Silverado EV Max: same behavior. Sierra EV ER (much smaller pack, 3 stops): 15h58, only 4 min slower than the Max. Hummer 3X @ 450 Wh/mi (control): 15h39, 1h12 charging. IONNA Sacramento 4→59% in 27 min (~255 kW). bp pulse Redding 10→71% in 31 min (~245 kW). Salem Supercharger (V3, 400V mode) is the same in both the Sierra Max and Hummer runs (45 min). Only the 800V curve is wrong. Expected: ~215+ kW average for 10–80% on 800V chargers, matching the Hummer 3X. Sacramento 7→59% in ~27–30 min. Sierra Max total around 15h35–15h40, clearly faster than the ER. Manual overrides should be applied. Plan links: Sierra EV Max (bugged): Link Hummer EV 3X @ 450 Wh/mi (control): Link