Join our newly restarted iOS Beta and try out new features sooner: https://testflight.apple.com/join/PDzBYbJw
Read more about ABRP beta at Installing the ABRP Beta version
What voice you can choose is not clear by the name. de-de-x-nfh-local or something else do not give any information, what kind of voice it is (man, woman whatever). It would be better to give the voices better names. By the way the choice is not saved.
if i only choose one preferred network and mark it with a heart, i would expect that only this one is being used. Instead i have to swap stations manually
I am using a BYD Seal 2023 Standard Range RWD and I believe there may be an issue with the vehicle model or consumption calculation in ABRP. My current settings are: Reference consumption: 167 Wh/km Maximum speed: 125 km/h Relative speed: 100% Battery degradation: 4% CCS However, on a recent route ABRP calculated: Distance: 434 km Estimated energy consumption: 83 kWh One charging stop: 28 minutes Start SOC: 100% Arrival SOC: 16% 83 kWh over 434 km corresponds to approximately 191 Wh/km, which is significantly higher than the 167 Wh/km reference consumption configured in the vehicle profile. More importantly, my real-world consumption with this car is considerably lower. Over approximately 2,500 km, my overall average is around 162 Wh/km, including mixed driving. On longer trips I frequently see approximately 150–160 Wh/km, depending on speed and conditions. I understand that ABRP adjusts consumption for elevation, speed, weather and other factors, but the difference appears unusually large. The route planner repeatedly predicts much higher consumption and longer charging stops than I experience in reality. Could you please check whether the BYD Seal 2023 Standard Range vehicle model, battery capacity, efficiency curve or elevation calculation may be incorrect? I have attached screenshots showing the vehicle settings and the route calculation. Thank you.
The route line is quite thick, which makes other map details hard to read underneath it. A slimmer line, closer to what Apple Maps uses, would improve readability a lot. Road numbers are not shown on the map. In Apple Maps the number of the road I'm driving on appears within the highlighted route itself, and surrounding roads carry small shield labels. This is very helpful for orientation, and I'd love to see the same in ABRP. Alternative routes are drawn in grey on the map, but I can't tap one to select it. Instead I have to open a separate interface and pick from a list, even though the alternatives are already visible on the map. Being able to simply tap the route I want, as in Apple Maps, would be much more intuitive. The labels for alternative routes appear as small balloons with an arrow right at the point where the route splits off. When several alternatives branch at roughly the same place, the balloons overlap and it's impossible to tell which time belongs to which route. Apple Maps places its label alongside the route, roughly halfway along it, which makes the association clear. It would also help if the labels stated the trade-off explicitly, for example "13 minutes longer", "10 minutes shorter" or "more efficient". None of these are blockers — the core planning is excellent — but together they would make the app significantly more comfortable to use while driving. I hope they're useful input. Best Regards, Jan
ABRP fails to recognise the data connection and causes the entire system to freeze. Vehicle is an Alpine A290 (2025)
While driving, ABRP will routinely lose my position requiring me to move my phone to regain position.
Add buc-ees charging stations ASAP. They are excellent. Smiths grove Kentucky specifically.
Cannot launch app, it crashes immediately, started after updating to 7.1.8. Deleted app, restarted, and reinstalled, and the same behavior. iPhone 15 Pro, iOS 17 (cannot update iOS due to specific reasons).