π§ THIS IS A TICKET MIGRATED FROM UPVOTY. The original ticket and comments will be available for a limited time over at:
https://abrp.upvoty.com/b/report-a-bug/very-long-incorrect-predicted-charge-times-for-manual-charging-waypoints/
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Hi,
When I add manual charge waypoints in ABRP for my Renault Zoe ZE50 R135 with CCS I see two bugs:
(a) Manual charge waypoints are usually ignored, even if I manually specify a charge time duration for the waypoint.
(b) Charging times for manual charge waypoints are always predicted by ABRP as much longer than reality.
The only way I have found to fix this is by manually specifying the charge power of the charge point when manually adding a waypoint.
Here is an example of the extended charging time bug (b).
This journey is a fully automatically planned round-trip to a charge point in the north of the UK - ABRP has estimated an extremely long charge time:
https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=bd97b099-6a55-4f53-a061-f6bb6d5092eb
If I manually specify the charge point power at the peak power the ZE50 with CCS supports, the charge time becomes what I would expect (the following journey has the charge point power manually set to 48kW):
https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=977da89b-280d-4c54-9e93-681cb3bc1474
The above happens on any manually added charge waypoint. Overriding the power always fixes it. It appears APRP isnβt correctly interpreting the maximum available power of manually added charging stops.
Many thanks,
Alex
Please authenticate to join the conversation.
Rejected
π Bug Reports
Over 2 years ago

Alex Rawcliffe
Get notified by email when there are changes.
Rejected
π Bug Reports
Over 2 years ago

Alex Rawcliffe
Get notified by email when there are changes.