Vehicle BMW i4 40 vs. BMW i4 35

🚧 THIS IS A TICKET MIGRATED FROM UPVOTY. The original ticket and comments will be available for a limited time over at:
https://abrp.upvoty.com/b/report-a-bug/vehicle-bmw-i4-40-vs-bmw-i4-35/
β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
Hi there,
I planned some routes with BMW i4 40 and BMW i4 35.
The smaller one, i4 35 looks pretty okay, whereas the i4 40 does not seem to add up.
E.g. a route of about 500km with 2 stops. ABRP gives me a total consumption of 99kWh. I can calculate for all the 3 legs as (Departure % - Arrival %) * (net battery capacity * battery degration).
For the i4 35 (net battery 67kWh) this adds up to 98,6 and ABRP shows 98,2kWh consumed --> perfect!!!
https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=57d86804-b67a-4d65-97c2-c1775ff0333e
For the i4 40 (net battery 81,1kWh) I have shorter charging stops, applying the same calculation I arrive at 110,2kWh whereas the ABRP consumption is 99,1kWh:
https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=65231706-3358-4ef4-91b8-10e203e11325
Summing it up, it seems like the i4 40 is 10% underrated, whereas the i4 35 is almost accurate.
Can you please investigate on the (much older) i4 40 and probably correct some values?
Thank you
Johannes

Where does this happen?
-
ABRP version number (found at bottom of settings menu)
-

Please authenticate to join the conversation.

Upvoters
Status

Rejected

Board

πŸ› Bug Reports

Date

Over 2 years ago

Author

Jo Pa

Subscribe to post

Get notified by email when there are changes.