Help Center

Improved

Fixed

abrp

Open

In Review

Planned

In Progress

Completed

Rejected

Awaiting Clarification

Main Roadmap

Quarterly Roadmap

Monthly Roadmap

Tell us how we can make ABRP even better for you! ⚡️

Have something to say?

Describe the issue and steps to reproduce.

🐛 Report a bug

💡 Request a feature

Specify the vehicle type and your requirements.

🚗 Request a vehicle

Request a charge card or charger network you're missing.

💳 Charge Card/Network Requests

Report missing or inaccurate charger locations.

⚡️ Report a Charger

Request live data connections for your vehicle model.

🔗 Integration Requests

📥 Feedback

🤔 Questions

Hey {name|there}! 👋

🚧 THIS IS A TICKET MIGRATED FROM UPVOTY. The original ticket and comments will be available for a limited time over at: <a href="https://abrp.upvoty.com/b/report-a-bug/planning-with-both-tesla-and-ionity-is-longer-and-takes-more-time-than-planning-with-only-tesla-sucs/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://abrp.upvoty.com/b/report-a-bug/planning-with-both-tesla-and-ionity-is-longer-and-takes-more-time-than-planning-with-only-tesla-sucs/</a> ——————————————————————————— How is it possible that the planning with both Tesla and Ionity as preferred chargers results in more kms and longer trip than when only Tesla charger is allowed?

A Better Routeplanner

Planning with both Tesla and Ionity is longer and takes more time than planning with only Tesla SuCs

Subscribe to post

Subscribe to post