Skip to main content

Filter „minimum number of stalls“ working improperly

Bug Reports

Filter for minimum number of stalls is set to 4, but planning this route

https://api.iternio.com/1/?eventlog_uuid=07658806-2a03-420d-8013-f25b1cb6c146 includes SuC Torrent South with 2 stalls. Same behaviour for filter setting of 3.

When changing filter to 5 or higher, it gets excluded.

Please investigate and correct.

Where does this happen?
ABRP version number (found at bottom of settings menu)
Posted by Carsten Kunkel ·
Status: In Review5 comments

Log in to comment and vote

Comments5

  • Katya S. changed status to Awaiting Clarification
    Team•

    Jan 24

    Pinned

    Hi @Carsten Kunkel,

    You’ve shared an event log, would you care to share the plan link instead?

    The setting for ‘minimum number of stalls’ is specified as being the 'preferred’ minimum number of stalls, and is therefore a ‘soft’ setting.

    • Carsten Kunkel

      •

      Jan 24

      Here‘s the correct link:

      https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=2-6974f064-8c5e7b74b9034c9d672e4442

      • Katya S.

        Team•

        Feb 16

        Given that the setting is soft and not strict, it still makes sense that the planner includes the charger with a lower number of stalls, when the minimum is just 4. In addition to this, results are circumstantial, and there will always be edge cases.

        I’ve noted that we should do better if possible, but it is not something we’d consider a direct bug.

        • Carsten Kunkel

          •

          Feb 16

          Thanks for the feedback.

          I am not a fan of „soft restrictions“. Especially with the minimum number of charge points where I deliberately want to exclude locations with less than eg 4 charge points.

          my proposal would be letting the user decide whether a setting should be a restriction or a recommendation.

    • Carsten Kunkel

      •

      Feb 11

      @Katya S. , would you be able to share an update? Thanks!