Skip to main content

Car Loading

Why aren't the battery savings during the train journey taken into account for routes that include car transport?

Where does this happen?
ABRP version number (found at bottom of settings menu)
Status: Awaiting Clarification2 comments

Log in to comment and vote

Comments2

  • ABRP User #2261229

    •

    Sep 21

    Hey, thanks for your answer. The Trip is goes from Bern, Switzerland to Kandersteg. There the car goes on a train and doesn’t use any batterie till Lötschberg. From Lötschberg I drive to Brig. In Brig I take another train where the car goes on to and doesn’t need batterie to Iselle. From iselle I drive to Losone. I started at 100% and arrived with around 60% batterie. According to your route planer I would have to charge twice and would arrive with less than 10%. Thats why I suppose that you do not take into account that the batterie isnt’t used while driving with the train, although the route is showing the train part. these trains go through big mountains, thats why there for. So you don’t need to drive over the mountain. I guess your systems thinks I drove over two mountains (two trains) and thats why it showed me such a big loss of battery..hope I explained it well. Thanks for taking my problem serious - Thomas

  • Mahde - ABRP

    Team•

    Sep 21

    Hello @Thomas Würgler,

    Do you mean that ABRP reduce the SoC during the train journey too? Is this a train where you can carry the vehicles inside of it? Please share an example trip of your experience and with the issue included.