There is an inconsistency in the driving time calculation when planning a route with the Leapmotor B10 profile compared to other vehicles (e.g. BYD Atto 3 Evo) on the exact same itinerary.
Observed behavior:
On an identical 756 km highway trip (Fontenay-le-Comte to Vergèze, France):
Leapmotor B10: estimated driving time is 7h 53 min (excluding 53 min charging).
BYD Atto 3 Evo: estimated driving time is 6h 28 min (excluding 56 min charging).
Both routes take the exact same roads (A10, A62, A61, A9), with 1 km difference due to charger locations (756 km vs 757 km). However, the Leapmotor profile results in +1h 25 min of driving time, corresponding to an average speed of ~96 km/h vs ~117 km/h on French 130 km/h motorways.
It looks like the vehicle profile for the Leapmotor B10 either has an incorrect default speed cap / reference consumption logic or applies an artificial speed restriction.
Comparison summary:
Route: Fontenay-le-Comte → Vergèze (France)
Leapmotor B10: 756 km | 7h 53m drive | 53m charge (3 stops)
BYD Atto 3 Evo: 757 km | 6h 28m drive | 56m charge (3 stops)
Shared plan links:
Leapmotor B10 : https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=2-6aaef4bb-d972b4ce07ae0c54526aba11
BYD Atto 3 Evo : https://abetterrouteplanner.com/?plan_uuid=2-6aaef51d-7b164d58f21b167afb67494c
Thanks in advance.
