Skip to main content

2024+ Peugeot e-Rifter

Stellantis has released a facelift of their K9 van platform with a slightly bigger battery and improved efficiency leading to a higher range.

As far as I understand, this facelift version is not set up in ABRP.

The improved version has been released as Peugeot e-Rifter, Citroen e-Berlingo and Opel/Vauxhall Combo Electric.

If possible, please add this vehicle version.

Are you requesting a new vehicle model or reporting an issue with an existing one?
13 comments

Log in to comment and vote

  • ABRP User #2282743

    •

    Jun 22

    I had the same problem and I have found a solution.

    1) don’t use the E-Rifter Vehicle Profile use the Peugeot e-208 instead this stops the car from throwing a wobbly when the dongle probes the car.

    2) the OBD PID for the odometer is incorrect for the E-Rifter and needs to be changed to 22D49C ( finding that value was not easy ;-)

    Now all I need to do is find out what I need to do to get the changes added into the list of vehicles. There doesn’t appear to be any instructions for that.

    • ABRP User #2060369

      •

      Jun 22

      Oh wow, I’ll try that. I’ve looked at the PID of both vehicle (using the e-208 2022-2023 profile, not the 2024 profile…) and there is a lot of differences…. Like they don’t even compare… So I would guess there is a problem with one of the PID’s of the e-rifter profile…. Did you try do compare/delete maybe some of them? Do you have any other issues maybe? Because having such difference between the PID profile and no issues seem uncanny…

      EDIT with the 2022-2023 profile, the OBD PID for the odometer is already correct on my abrp…

      • ABRP User #2282743

        •

        Jun 22

        I tried the e-208 as it had a similar battery capacity but was part of a group of vehicles that have a PSA architecture if that is the correct term ( saw that on another ODB reading app ) which was different from the 2022 E-Rifter and it seemed to work.

        The odometer was the only thing that wasn’t working, but that now looks correct as you said.

    • ABRP User #2529794

      •

      Jun 27

      Which version of the e-208 did you use?

      Thanks in advance..- :)