We need the OBD PID commands and how to interpret the returned data. Since this is not easily available for most vehicles there is not possibility for us to provide a time estimate.
If you find that an existing vehicle profile reads data correctly, please let us know, but please DO NOT keep using the incorrect vehicle model with live data.
Katya S.
Team•
Apr 15
Could be that the PIDs we use for an already supported vehicle model could work. Here’s what you can do once you have access to the vehicle and a dongle;
Select the actual model of your car, save it
In vehicle settings, change the model of the saved vehicle to one that you suspect has compatible OBD commands (just any model will not work, it needs to be compatible)
Link the vehicle via OBD (details here; OBD Connection )
Select the correct vehicle model again
After verifying that the data is read correctly (or even partially correctly) notify us that the OBD commands for vehicle model X also works for vehicle model Y.
ABRP User #749517
•
Jun 6
I have the listo of some PIDs, header, mode, commands for the car … can I be a tester for ABRP and in that way speed the integration with my car?
Mahde - ABRP
Team•
Jul 10
Hello @ABRP User #749517,
We have added OBD support for the Deepal S05 now. Please check how it works for you when trying it and give us feedback on any issues you find.
ABRP User #2776498
•
Jul 10
Hello
I Have a Vgate BLE 4.0, Would It Be compatible? How can I get It to work?
Mahde - ABRP
Team•
Jul 14
The Vgate BLE 4.0 is suggested to use with ABRP. Please read this article for more information regarding connecting with OBD and how it works:
Hi … I have a question … do ABRP use the info that I shared on github? if so what Pid are being used to get the SOH?
ABRP User #749517
•
Jul 11
At this moment this is correct …
PID
Verified
F22F
SOC ✅
F228
Voltage ✅
F229
Current ✅
F252
Temp Max ✅
F253
Temp Min ✅
F255
Temp Charge ✅
F260
CC2 Resistance ✅
I have more PIDs verified but I don’t believe ABRP need then. What is important and really missing SOH & charing cycles.
ABRP User #749517
•
Jul 30
Meanwhile a new update … I’ve been using the app and it shows degradation as 0% … how it is being calculated by ABRP? in my car it shows 97%, which means degradation after 2500 km is 3%. Also, I may found the DID/PID which turns out the SOH … 7A122F230, and also 31.
How does it work? 30 shows the CLTC raw range and 31 the CLTC range corrected, then the SOH estimated is based on the ratio now/new CLTC range for the model (still testing to validate it…). Regarding to the consumption it seems to be quite accurate because it matches with my own calculation of consumption following this method: register the number of kms made and the energy charged.
ABRP User #749517
•
Aug 31
BMS SOH measurements obtained by the PID/DID 7A1 F2 64, where the formula in use is 100 - A/68, getting an uncertainty of 0.22% due to oscillations in the measured values that are continuously being registered.
Log in to comment and vote
Comments10
Apr 15
PinnedHi,
We need the OBD PID commands and how to interpret the returned data. Since this is not easily available for most vehicles there is not possibility for us to provide a time estimate.
You can check our telemetry API for relevant properties:
documenter.getpostman.com/view/7396339/SWTK5a8w
Also, you can check our (partially outdated) OBD repository to see what other cars report:
https://www.github.com/iternio/ev-obd-pids
If you find that an existing vehicle profile reads data correctly, please let us know, but please DO NOT keep using the incorrect vehicle model with live data.
Katya S.
Apr 15
Could be that the PIDs we use for an already supported vehicle model could work. Here’s what you can do once you have access to the vehicle and a dongle;
Select the actual model of your car, save it
In vehicle settings, change the model of the saved vehicle to one that you suspect has compatible OBD commands (just any model will not work, it needs to be compatible)
Link the vehicle via OBD (details here; OBD Connection )
Select the correct vehicle model again
After verifying that the data is read correctly (or even partially correctly) notify us that the OBD commands for vehicle model X also works for vehicle model Y.
ABRP User #749517
Jun 6
I have the listo of some PIDs, header, mode, commands for the car … can I be a tester for ABRP and in that way speed the integration with my car?
Mahde - ABRP
Jul 10
Hello @ABRP User #749517,
We have added OBD support for the Deepal S05 now. Please check how it works for you when trying it and give us feedback on any issues you find.
ABRP User #2776498
Jul 10
Hello
I Have a Vgate BLE 4.0, Would It Be compatible? How can I get It to work?
Mahde - ABRP
Jul 14
The Vgate BLE 4.0 is suggested to use with ABRP. Please read this article for more information regarding connecting with OBD and how it works:
https://abrp.featurebase.app/en/help/articles/8378485-link-your-vehicle-via-an-obd-device
ABRP User #749517
Jul 10
Hi … I have a question … do ABRP use the info that I shared on github? if so what Pid are being used to get the SOH?
ABRP User #749517
Jul 11
At this moment this is correct …
PID
Verified
F22F
SOC ✅
F228
Voltage ✅
F229
Current ✅
F252
Temp Max ✅
F253
Temp Min ✅
F255
Temp Charge ✅
F260
CC2 Resistance ✅
I have more PIDs verified but I don’t believe ABRP need then. What is important and really missing SOH & charing cycles.
ABRP User #749517
Jul 30
Meanwhile a new update … I’ve been using the app and it shows degradation as 0% … how it is being calculated by ABRP? in my car it shows 97%, which means degradation after 2500 km is 3%. Also, I may found the DID/PID which turns out the SOH … 7A122F230, and also 31.
How does it work? 30 shows the CLTC raw range and 31 the CLTC range corrected, then the SOH estimated is based on the ratio now/new CLTC range for the model (still testing to validate it…). Regarding to the consumption it seems to be quite accurate because it matches with my own calculation of consumption following this method: register the number of kms made and the energy charged.
ABRP User #749517
Aug 31
BMS SOH measurements obtained by the PID/DID 7A1 F2 64, where the formula in use is 100 - A/68, getting an uncertainty of 0.22% due to oscillations in the measured values that are continuously being registered.